Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 17;2017(11):CD005067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005067.pub4
Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Setting/location: Iran
Study period: not described
Sample size calculation: not described
Participants Type of Leishmania: not mentioned
Inclusion criteria: CL confirmed with direct smear, aged 1‐20 years, maximum number of lesions 3, maximum size of lesion 5 cm, duration of disease less than 8 weeks
Exclusion criteria: history of allergy to MA, pregnancy or lactating
N randomised: 210
Withdrawals: 53: 29/105 in group 1 and 24/105 in group 2
N assessed: 157. Group 1: 76, group 2: 81
Age: not described
Baseline data: not described
Interventions Type of interventions:
  • Group 1: combination triple therapy consisting of: 15% PR + 10% urea applied twice daily for 4 weeks, cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen repeated every 2 weeks till complete healing or for a maximum of 3 sessions, ILMA twice every week till complete healing or for a maximum of 6 weeks (in sessions that both cryotherapy and injections were used, cryo was done before injections)

  • Group 2: ILMA twice every week till complete healing or for a maximum of 6 weeks


Duration of intervention: 6 weeks
Outcomes Healing rates: percentage of participants 'cured' 2 weeks after treatment
Adverse effects
Time points reported: not described
Notes Study funding sources: not reported
Possible conflicts of interest: none declared
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: insufficient detail was reported about the method used to generate the allocation sequence.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk High rates of dropouts: 53/210 (25.2%)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The study protocol is not available, but it is clear that the published reports include all expected outcomes
Other bias High risk Sample size calculation, reporting of Leishmania spp involved and baseline comparability were not correctly reported