Trial ID | Outcome | High risk of bias (category A)a | High risk of bias (category D)b | High risk of bias (category E)c | High risk of bias (category G)d |
Da Qing 1997 | Non‐fatal myocardial infarction | N/D | Yes (abstract mentions it was assessed) | N/D | N/D |
Non‐fatal stroke | Yes (abstract mentions it was assessed) | ||||
Amputation of lower extremity | Yes (abstract mentions it was assessed) | ||||
DPP 2002 | Serious adverse events | Yes | |||
Non‐fatal myocardial infarction | N/D | Yes | |||
Non‐fatal stroke | Yes | ||||
Non‐serious adverse events | Yes | N/D | |||
Hypoglycaemia | Yes | ||||
DPS 2001 | Cardiovascular mortality | Yes | |||
Non‐fatal myocardial infarction | Yes | ||||
Non‐fatal stroke | Yes | ||||
EDIPS 2009 | Health‐related quality of life | Yes | |||
Hellgren 2016 | N/D | ||||
HELP PD 2011 | Serious adverse events | N/D | Yes | N/D | |
Non‐serious adverse events | Yes | ||||
Health‐related quality of life | Yes | ||||
Time to progression to T2DM | Yes | ||||
IDPP 2006 | Serious adverse events | Yes | |||
Non‐fatal myocardial infarction | Yes | ||||
Non‐fatal stroke | Yes | ||||
Non‐serious adverse events | N/D | Yes | N/D | ||
JDPP 2013 | Incidence of T2DM | Yes (long‐term (6 years) follow‐up of diabetes incidence) | N/D | ||
Serious adverse events | Yes | N/D | |||
Non‐serious adverse events | Yes | ||||
Measures of blood glucose control | Yes | ||||
Kosaka 2005 | All‐cause mortality | N/D | Yes | ||
Serious adverse events | Yes | ||||
Cardiovascular mortality | Yes | ||||
Non‐serious adverse events | Yes | ||||
Measures of blood glucose control | N/D | Yes | N/D | ||
Oldroyd 2005 | N/D | ||||
PODOSA 2014 | N/D | ||||
SLIM 2003 | N/D | ||||
N/A: not applicable; N/D: none detected aClear that outcome was measured and analysed; trial report states that outcome was analysed but reports only that result was not significant (Classification 'A', table 2, Kirkham 2010). bClear that outcome was measured and analysed; trial report states that outcome was analysed but reports no results (Classification 'D', table 2, Kirkham 2010). cClear that outcome was measured but was not necessarily analysed; judgement says likely to have been analysed but not reported because of non‐significant results (Classification 'E', table 2, Kirkham 2010). dUnclear whether outcome was measured; not mentioned, but clinical judgement says likely to have been measured and analysed but not reported on the basis of non‐significant results (Classification 'G', table 2, Kirkham 2010). |