Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 22;2017(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2
Methods RCT, active‐controlled
Date of study: not stated
Location: not stated
Participants Randomised: 60 participants (age range 28‐67 years (etanercept), 32‐65 years (acitretin), 24 male)
Inclusion criteria
  • Participants with moderate‐severe psoriasis (PASI ≥ 10, BSA ≥ 10)


Exclusion criteria
  • Pregnancy

  • Had an active infection

  • Past history of malignant tumours


Dropouts and withdrawals
  • Not stated

Interventions Intervention
A. Etanercept (n = 30), SC, 50 mg, twice a week, 12 weeks
Control intervention
B. Acitretin (n = 30), orally, 0.4 mg/kg/day, 12 weeks
Outcomes Assessment at 12 weeks
Primary and secondary outcomes of the trial
  • Not stated


Outcomes of the trial
  • Mean PASI at baseline and at 12 weeks

  • PASI 75, PASI 50

Notes Funding: not stated
Declarations of interest: not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote (p 211): "Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups"
Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee random sequence generation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: probably open‐label trial, term "blind" not used
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes High risk Comment: probably open‐label trial, term "blind" not used
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no description of the method used to manage the missing data. No ITT analyses mentioned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Comment: no primary or secondary outcomes stated