Methods | RCT, active‐controlled Date of study: not stated Location: not stated |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 60 participants (age range 28‐67 years (etanercept), 32‐65 years (acitretin), 24 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Etanercept (n = 30), SC, 50 mg, twice a week, 12 weeks Control intervention B. Acitretin (n = 30), orally, 0.4 mg/kg/day, 12 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Assessment at 12 weeks Primary and secondary outcomes of the trial
Outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | Funding: not stated Declarations of interest: not stated |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote (p 211): "Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two groups" Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee random sequence generation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: probably open‐label trial, term "blind" not used |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: probably open‐label trial, term "blind" not used |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: no description of the method used to manage the missing data. No ITT analyses mentioned |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no primary or secondary outcomes stated |