Methods | RCT, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial Date of study: December 2001‐April 2002 Location: 47 centres in USA |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 672 participants (mean age 45 years, 672 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Etanercept LD (n = 169), SC auto‐administered, 25 mg, once/week, 12 weeks Control intervention B. Etanercept MD (n = 167), SC auto‐administered, 25 mg, twice/week, 12 weeks C. Etanercept HD (n = 168), SC auto‐administered, 50 mg, twice/week, 12 weeks D. Placebo (n = 168), SC, 12 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Assessments at 12 weeks Primary outcomes of the trial
Secondary outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | Funding source, quote (p 2021): "Supported by Immunex, Seattle, a wholly‐owned subsidiary of Agen, Thousand Oaks, Calif" Declarations of interest (p 2021): "Drs. Leonardi, Powers, Goffe, and Gottlieb report having served as consultants for Amgen, and Drs. Leonardi, Goffe, and Gottlieb report having served as paid lecturers for Amgen. Dr. Gottlieb reports having served as a consultant and paid lecturer for Johnson & Johnson, Genentech, and Biogen; Dr. Leonardi reports having served as a consultant and paid lecturer for Johnson & Johnson and Genentech; Dr. Powers reports having served as a consultant for Genentech and Biogen; and Dr. Goffe reports having served as a consultant and paid lecturer for Biogen. Dr. Zitnik and Ms. Wang report owning equity in Amgen." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 2016): "Patients underwent central randomisation with the use of a permuted block randomisation list, with equal allocation to each of the four treatment groups" Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee the allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 2015): "Double‐blind... Etanercept ... was supplied to patients in syringes, each containing the contents of one reconstituted vial of etanercept or matching placebo...All patients received two injections per dose of study" Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 2015): "Double‐blind... Etanercept ... was supplied to patients in syringes, each containing the contents of one reconstituted vial of etanercept or matching placebo...All patients received two injections per dose of study" Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 672 randomised participants, 652 analysed (20 participants did not receive the treatment and were excluded from the analyses) Comment: modified ITT but number of participants not receiving treatment and not included in the analysis low and comparable between groups |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Comment: no protocol was available. The pre‐specified outcomes mentioned in the methods section appeared to have been reported |