Methods | RCT, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial Date of study: December 2005–September 2007 Location: 48 centres in USA, Canada, Belgium |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 766 participants (mean age 45 years, 531 male) Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention A. Ustekinumab (n = 255), SC, 45 mg, weeks 0‐4 and every 12 weeks, 40 weeks Control intervention B. Ustekinumab (n = 256), SC, 90 mg, weeks 0‐4 and every 12 weeks, 40 weeks C. Placebo (n = 255), SC, weeks 0‐4, 40 weeks |
|
Outcomes | Assessments at 12 weeks Primary outcomes of the trial
Secondary outcomes of the trial
|
|
Notes | Funding source, quote (p 1665): Centocor Inc. Declarations of interest (p 1673): "CLL has served as a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, and Genentech, as an investigator for Abbott, Allergan, Altana, Alza, Amgen, Astellas, Celgene, Centocor, Genentech, Bristol Myers, Eli Lilly, Fujisawa, Galderma, CombinatoRx, 3M Pharmaceuticals, Perrigo Isreal Pharamceutical, ScheringPlough, Serono, RTL, Novartis, Vitae, and Wyeth, and as a speaker for Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Genentech, and Warner Chilcott. ABK has served as an investigator and consultant for Abbott, Amgen, and Centocor and has been a study steering committee member, speaker, and fellowship funding recipient from Centocor. KAP has served as a consultant and advisory board member for Abbott, Alza, Amgen, Celgene, Centocor, Johnson and Johnson, Isotechnika, Janssen Ortho Biotech, Medimmune, MerckSerono, and Wyeth. KBG has served as a consultant for Abbott, Amgen, Astellas, Centocor, and Genentech and has received grant support from Abbott, Astellas, and Centocor. NY, CG, YW, SL, and LTD are employees of Centocor and own stock in Johnson and Johnson." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 1667‐68): “...via a centralised interactive voice response system” Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote (p 1667‐68): “...via a centralised interactive voice response system” Comment: no description of the method used to guarantee allocation concealment |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 1666‐67): “This phase 3, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled... Patients received placebo injections as needed to preserve the blind. The study sponsor was unblinded to treatment... Site monitors, investigators, site personnel involved in the study conduct, and patients remained blinded until week 76” Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 1666‐67): “This phase 3, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled... Patients received placebo injections as needed to preserve the blind. The study sponsor was unblinded to treatment... Site monitors, investigators, site personnel involved in the study conduct, and patients remained blinded until week 76” Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Included 255/256/255 Analysed 255/256/255 Quote (p 1668): "Efficacy data from all randomised patients were analysed according to the assigned treatment group.... Patients who discontinued study treatment... were deemed to be treatment failures" Comment: probably done |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00267969). The pre‐specified outcomes and those mentioned in the methods section appeared to have been reported. |