Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;2017(12):CD000467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000467.pub2

Sauza 1984.

Methods Parallel double‐blind randomized controlled trial
Participants 25 patients entering the trial, 18 completing the 10‐week study
17/18 completing the trial female
Mean age 41 years, range 24 to 71
Only 1 with primary Raynaud's, 17 with secondary Raynaud's, 10 with recurrent digital pitting scars, none given vasodilators for at least 2 weeks before start of the study
Interventions 10 given nifedipine (30 mg to 60 mg/d)
8 given matching placebo
Outcomes Number of Raynaud's attacks during previous 2 weeks
Intensity of attacks
Side effects
Improvements
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Evidence insufficient for judgement of risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Evidence insufficient for judgement of risk
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind study
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Participant subjective assessments
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 18/25 completing the 10‐week trial (7 exclusions due to compliance issues, failure to attend follow‐up appointments, or modifications in treatment programs)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None detected
Other bias Low risk Two groups with similar baseline characteristics