Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 13;2017(12):CD000467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000467.pub2

Teixeira da Costa.

Methods Double‐blind randomized placebo‐controlled trial
 Cross‐over study
Participants N = 15 patients, 14 with associated connective tissue disorder
 1 dropout, 2 exclusions due to incomplete data
Interventions Study carried out in 2 treatment periods, each of 2 weeks separated by a 1‐week washout period from beginning of February to end of March
 Participants given diltiazem or placebo. During second treatment period, each group crossed‐over to opposite treatment
 Total study duration 5 weeks
Outcomes Subjective criteria: weekly frequency of vasospastic attacks recorded daily by participant; participant evaluation of effectiveness of study agent on 5‐point clinical scale, taking frequency, severity, and duration into account
 Objective: digital rheography recorded after 5 minutes of immersion of the hands in water at 30 degrees Celsius, and after 5 minutes of immersion at 5 degrees Celsius. Digital rheography performed immediately before start of the study, on the last day of first treatment, and on the last day of second treatment
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Evidence insufficient for judgement of risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Evidence insufficient for judgement of risk
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐blind
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Subjective participant assessment of frequency, severity, and duration of attacks and overall effectiveness of treatment
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 3/15 participants excluded (1 dropout due to side effects, 2 others with incomplete diary records excluded from analyses)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk None detected
Other bias Low risk Washout period of 1 week separating cross‐over phases