Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;2015(6):CD010037. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010037.pub2
•  low risk of bias (e.g. telephone or central randomisation; consecutively‐numbered sealed opaque envelopes)
•  high risk of bias (open random allocation; unsealed or non‐opaque envelopes, alternation; date of birth)
•  unclear risk of bias