Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 4;2016(4):CD011586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011586.pub2

Comparison 5. Cadexomer iodine versus standard care.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Complete wound healing 1 38 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 6.0 [0.80, 45.20]
2 Adverse events 1 27 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 10.27 [0.62, 169.16]
3 Reduction in wound area 1 27 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 18.80 [‐5.65, 43.25]
4 Pain 1 26 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐4.4 [‐10.82, 2.02]