Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 4;2016(4):CD011586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011586.pub2

Comparison 7. Iodine sugar versus lysozyme.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Complete wound healing 1 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.20 [0.60, 2.37]
2 Adverse events 1 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.03, 3.00]
3 Serious adverse events 1 141 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.01, 7.72]
4 Reduction in wound area by at least 25% 1 121 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.33 [1.02, 1.73]
5 Improvement in wound infection status (to highest level) 1 122 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.65 [1.01, 2.68]