Comparison 7. Iodine sugar versus lysozyme.
Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 Complete wound healing | 1 | 141 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.20 [0.60, 2.37] |
2 Adverse events | 1 | 141 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.32 [0.03, 3.00] |
3 Serious adverse events | 1 | 141 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 0.32 [0.01, 7.72] |
4 Reduction in wound area by at least 25% | 1 | 121 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.33 [1.02, 1.73] |
5 Improvement in wound infection status (to highest level) | 1 | 122 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) | 1.65 [1.01, 2.68] |