Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 11;2017(11):CD003575. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003575.pub6

Comparison 8. Budesonide versus placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Clinical response 4 161 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.98 [1.14, 7.75]
2 Clinical response sensitivity analysis excluding Miehlke 2014 3 94 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.56 [2.43, 8.55]
3 Histological response 4 161 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.68 [1.37, 5.24]
4 Histological response sensitivity analysis excluding Miehlke 2014 3 94 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.15 [2.25, 7.66]
5 Maintenance of clinical response 3 172 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.30 [2.13, 5.09]
6 Maintenance of histological response 2 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.17 [1.44, 6.95]
7 Adverse events 5 290 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.92, 1.51]
8 Withdrawals due to adverse events 5 290 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.43, 2.17]
9 Serious adverse events 4 175 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.15, 8.01]