Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Genet. 2018 Dec 22;56(5):317–324. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105577

Table 3.

Distribution of decisional conflict predictors across categories of decisional latency

Decisional Latency
“I was able to make my decision...”
Characteristica Right
away
(n=2,206)
After several
hours
(n=382)
After several
days
(n=296)
p value


Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

Decisional Conflict 14.4 (12.7) 20.1 (12.5) 24.4 (12.2) <0.01b
Age 59.9 (8.1) 60.7 (8.1) 61.1 (7.7) 0.02d
Months in registry 57.7 (19.9) 58.1 (19.5) 57.0 (19.8) 0.60b
Gx knowledge 8.1 (2.5) 8.2 (2.2) 7.8 (2.6) 0.08b

N (%) N (%) N (%)

Education (ordinal) 0.01b
 Grades 1–8 1 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 Grades 9–11 6 (0.2) 1 (0.3) 1 (0.3)
 Grade 12/GED 242 (11.1) 44 (11.8) 44 (15.2)
 College 1–3 years 823 (37.8) 123 (32.9) 121 (41.7)
 College 4+ years 600 (27.5) 117 (31.3) 67 (23.1)
 Grad/professional school 508 (23.3) 89 (23.8) 54 (19.7)
Gender Male 915 (42.1) 179 (47.2) 110 (37.8) 0.04c
Race White 2,102 (96.7) 369 (97.4) 281 (96.9) 0.81c
Marital status 0.38c
 Married/Partnered 1,807 (83.2) 326 (86.0) 239 (82.1)
 No longer partnered 270 (12.4) 34 (9.0) 37 (12.7)
 Single, never married 96 (4.4) 19 (5.0) 15 (5.2)
Insurancee 0.47c
 Employer only 1,368 (62.8) 217 (57.7) 174 (60.2)
 Government 582 (26.7) 119 (31.6) 83 (28.7)
 Private 211 (9.7) 37 (9.8) 31 (10.7)
 No insurance 19 (0.9) 3 (0.8) 1 (0.3)
Confidence w/ med forms <0.01c
 Extremely 1,711 (78.6) 279 (74.2) 177 (60.8)
 Quite a bit 356 (16.4) 68 (18.1) 77 (26.5)
 Not at all to somewhat 109 (5.0) 29 (7.7) 37 (12.7)
Full confidence in coping 891 (40.7) 89 (23.4) 58 (19.9) <0.01c
Previous Gx test 227 (10.3) 28 (7.3) 19 (6.4) 0.03c
Before enrolling, talked w/
 Family Member 546 (24.8) 203 (53.1) 157 (53.0) <0.01c
 Friend 26 (1.2) 15 (3.9) 22 (7.4) <0.01c
 Healthcare provider 30 (1.4) 2 (0.5) 8 (2.7) 0.05c
 RAVE Staff 57 (2.6) 5 (1.3) 8 (2.7) 0.31c
 Other 31 (1.4) 5 (1.3) 8 (2.7) 0.22c
a

Characteristics are included for analysis here based on their inclusion in the final logistic regression model;

b

Kruskall Wallis;

c

Chi-Square;

d

ANOVA F-Test.

e

At least 80% of expected cell counts are ≥ 5.