. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 15.

Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2019 Jan 11;125(10):1709–1716. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31956

Table 4.

Multivariable Regression Models of Patient Decision Appraisal

	Subjective Decision Quality^a		Deliberation^b
DSP Characteristic	Odds Ratio (95% CI)	P	Odd Ratio (95% CI)	P
Informed	1.46 (1.03 – 2.08)	0.03	0.76 (0.56 – 1.02)	0.06
Involved	0.89 (0.63 – 1.38)	0.54	0.92 (0.68 – 1.23)	0.57
Aware	0.86 (0.60 – 1.23)	0.40	1.83 (1.36 – 2.47)	<.01
Objective Knowledge	0.91 (0.66 – 1.27)	0.59	1.25 (0.94 – 1.65)	0.12

95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.

DSP race was also significantly associated with subjective decision quality.

DSP race and education, as well as patient comorbid conditions and surgery type, were also significantly associated with deliberation. Models also adjusted for DSP age, patient stage, receipt of chemotherapy, receipt of radiation, and SEER site without significant associations with patient decision appraisal.