Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 26.
Published before final editing as: J Ment Health. 2018 Oct 26:1–9. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1521942

Table 2.

Mixed effects regression results indicating the impact of the PP intervention (compared to CC) on psychological outcomes at 4 and 8 weeks.*

Outcome 4 weeks 8 weeks
Coefficient 95% CI Effect size** p Coefficient 95% CI Effect size** p
Positive Affect (PANAS) 6.81 −1.22 to 14.83 1.16 .10 5.58 −1.55 to 12.71 0.95 .13
Gratitude (GQ-6) 3.91 −3.82 to 11.64 0.68 .32 2.99 −3.95 to 9.93 0.52 .40
Optimism (LOT-R) 5.61 −0.59 to 11.81 1.24 .08 4.96 −0.54 to 10.46 1.10 .08
Depression (QIDS-SR) −0.05 −6.38 to 6.27 −0.01 .99 −0.31 −5.95 to 5.32 −0.07 .91
Hopelessness (BHS) −3.67 −9.81 to 2.47 −0.81 .24 −1.10 −6.56 to 4.36 −0.24 .69
Suicidality (CHRT) 4.69 −4.67 to 14.05 0.68 .33 2.87 −5.44 to 11.18 0.42 .50
*

Results of mixed effects regression models. Coefficients are Group x Time interaction values.

**

Effect size was calculated by dividing the Group x Time interaction coefficient of each variable at each time point by the standard deviation (SD) of the residual in the regression model.

BHS = Beck Hopelessness Scale; CHRT = Concise Health Risk Tracking; GQ-6 = Gratitude Questionnaire-6; LOT-R = Life Orientation Test – Revised; PANAS = Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; QIDS-SR = Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self-Report