Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr-Jun;20(2):102–108.

Table 4.

Results of mixed effect logistic regression model for delivery at home

Variable Category OR 95% CI for OR p-value
Wealth index
Poor Ref
Middle 0.61 [0.4868,0.7331] <0.001
Rich 0.48 [0.3869,0.5731] <0.001
Radio
Not at all Ref
Sometimes 1.14 [0.8674, 1.4126] 0.278
Always 1.10 [0.8305, 1.3695] 0.455
TV
Not at all Ref
Some times 0.60 [0.4471, 0.7529] <0.001
Always 0.31 [0.2195, 0.4005] <0.001
Age
15–19 Ref
20–24 1.37 [0.8920, 1.8480] 0.073
25–29 1.98 [1.2931, 2.6670] < 0.001
30–34 2.00 [1.2787, 2.7213] <0.001
35=39 1.95 [1.2276, 2.6724] <0.001
40–45 2.64 [1.4499, 3.8301] <0.001
45–49 4.13 [1.8192, 7.4408] <0.001
ANC
Not at all Ref
1 up to 3 times 1.02 [0.8421, 1.1979] 0.856
4 and above times 0.96 [0.8019, 1.1181] 0.662
Mother Education
Uneducated Ref
Primary 0.48 [0.4000, 0.5600] <0.001
Secondary & higher 0.28 [0.1971, 0.3629] <0.001
Residence
Urban Ref
Rural 3.47 [2.6468, 4.2932] <0.001

Random-effects Variance =0.64 [0.3928148 1.042745]
Parameters SE=0.159

LR test vs. logistic regression, chibar2 (01)=157.33, Prob>=chibar2<0.001, Ref.=Reference, SE: Standard error