Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 25;116(17):8249–8254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1814970116

Table 3.

Effect of the ratio of forest area on access to each source of drinking water

Dependent variable Estimate (SE) R2 N
Clean water
Piped water into dwelling 0.0313 (0.0329) 0.114 9,682
Piped water into yard 0.131 (0.0828) 0.156 9,682
Piped water at public tap 0.934*** (0.300) 0.321 9,682
Protected well/tube 0.101 (0.431) 0.279 9,682
Less clean water
Unprotected well 0.585** (0.228) 0.243 9,682
River/pond/lake/dam 0.321 (0.420) 0.193 9,682
Unprotected spring 0.0342 (0.0642) 0.056 9,682

Details are in Table 2 legend. The dependent variable in each row is a dummy variable indicating whether a household uses the corresponding source of water as drinking water. The column of the estimated coefficient shows the estimated coefficient of the ratio of forest area and its SE in the two-stage least-squares regression. All specifications include all control variables (cluster fixed effect, time fixed effect, log of rainfall, log of population, temperature in July, temperature in November, demographic characteristics, household wealth, and the cluster-level initial value × time dummy). * indicates significant at 10%; ** indicates significant at 5%; *** indicates significant at 1%.