Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Cogn. 2018 May 1;124:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.04.001

Table 1.

Scores on the Prosody Assessments by the Four Cases and the Controls (Given in percent correct for matching and identification tasks and given as coefficient of fundamental frequency (F0-CV%) for the production tasks).

Assessment Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Controls mean±SD & number
Identification of acoustic features in sentences 33% 52% 83% 100% 82.4±4.4 (n= 22)
Identification of features to match emotion words 85% 83% 67% 83% 93.1±5.4 (n= 7)
Identification of emotions from sentences 50% 29% 30% 85% 90.0±7.0 (n= 22)
Matching emotions to synonyms 100% 92% 92% 88% 93.6±5.4 (n= 8)
Matching non-emotional abstract synonyms 100% 92% 88% 100% 98.6±4.2 (n= 22)
Matching emotions to situations 100% 95% 100% 100% 98.3±2.6 (n= 6)
Matching emotions to faces 83.9% DNT 82% 92.5% 89.3±6.6 (n=40)
Sentence reading without cues (F0-CV%) 31.0 24.3 34.6 11.7 24.31±6.2 (n=10)
Sentence reading with cues (F0-CV%) 41.6 32.3 DNT 21.2 19.78±2.1 (n= 10)
Sentence repetition (F0-CV%) 32.3 DNT 29.4 26.5 23.7±2.6 (n=60)
*

DNT= did not test