Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;2019(4):CD001808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001808.pub3

Orji 2008.

Methods Randomised controlled trial.
Eligible participants who gave informed consent were randomly allocated to either oxytocin or ergometrine group. Allocation was done by opening a sealed envelope from a pack that had been arranged serially. Not blinded.
Participants 600 consenting women in labour with no illnesses or added risk in the active phase at 2 tertiary hospitals in Nigeria.
Excluded those with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, packed cell volume < 30%, history of PPH, haemoglobinopathy, heart disease or caesarean section.
Interventions At delivery of the anterior shoulder:
A. oxytocin 10 IU IV (n = 297);
B. ergometrine 0.25 mg IV (n = 303).
In both groups the third stage of labour was managed actively.
Blood loss was measured using a pre‐weighed guaze that was weighed again after delivery.
Outcomes Primary outcomes: PPH (> 500 mL), severe PPH (> 1000 mL).
Secondary outcomes: retained placenta, need for blood transfusion, manual placental removal, estimated blood loss (mL), nausea, vomiting, headaches, elevated blood pressure, need for additional uterotonics.
Notes Dates of study: January 2006 to September 2007
Funding sources: not reported
Declarations of interest: not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomly assigned to previously determined sequence.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "...sealed envelopes arranged serially...".
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not mentioned in report assumed not due to different doses of drug being given.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not mentioned in report
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data appear to be reported for all participants. No loss to follow‐up reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Protocol unseen but all outcomes pre‐specified in methods text are reported
Other bias Unclear risk No data.