Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 28;5(4):719–726. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00130

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(a) Optimization test of flowing water device on voltage and flow rate (100 ppb of starting concentration, 5 mL min–1 of flow rate). (b) Flowing water treatment comparison between CF and PACCF in the same optimum condition (100 ppb of starting concentration, 5 mL min–1 of flow rate, 10 V). (c) Remaining concentrations for long-term flowing with single ion (Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+) simulated water (∼100 ppb). The heavy metal ion concentration in the output water is below the drinking safety level (100 ppb of starting concentration, 5 mL min–1 of flow rate, 10 V). (Note: each point of 0 mL is tested on the first 5 mL of filtrated water by ICP-MS.)