Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;70(9):2463–2477. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery394

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

A comparison of the original FM implementation (FMv1) with the adaptation used in this work (FM-lite) for 800 h of growth. FM-lite simulations were performed in the Haskell implementation of Chromar and results were averaged over five runs. FMv1 simulations were carried out in the MATLAB environment. (A) Comparison of simulated rosette mass trajectories between FMv1 and FM-lite. (B) Comparison of simulated root mass trajectories between FMv1 and FM-lite. (C) Comparison of simulated sucrose carbon between FMv1 and FM-lite. (D) Comparison of simulated starch carbon between FMv1 and FM-lite.