Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 14;13(5):1137–1149. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12472

Table 2.

Associations of plasma levels of circulating lncRNAs and miRNAs with clinicopathological parameters of BC patients at diagnosis

Parameters Plasma lncRNAs and miRNAs – P values
H19 miR‐675 NEAT1 miR‐204 miR‐331
Correlations*
lncRNA/miRNA 0.007 (coefficient: 0.334) 0.070 (coefficient: −0.293)
BC patient subgroups vs. healthy women**
All 0.030 a 0.228 0.030 a 0.757 0.012 b
Neg. nodal status 0.033 a 0.067 0.045 a 0.632 0.031 b
Pos. nodal status 0.083 0.403 0.034 a 0.902 0.002 b
HER2‐pos. (ER‐neg./PR‐neg.) 0.008 a 0.375 0.412 0.051 0.043 b
TNBC (ER‐neg./PR‐neg./HER2‐neg.) 0.660 0.060 0.002 a 0.820 0.264
Differences between the BC patient subgroups**
Pos. vs. neg. lymph node status 0.430 0.004 a 0.092 0.684 0.192
TNBC vs. the other subgroups in which one or two or all receptors (ER, PR, HER2) are pos. 0.012 a 0.067 0.122 0.795 0.129
HER2‐pos. (ER‐neg./PR‐neg.) vs. the other receptor statuses 0.001 a 0.007 b 0.030 b 0.017 a 0.628
ER‐neg. vs. ER‐pos. 0.075 0.048 0.729 0.253 0.034
PR‐neg. vs. PR‐pos. 0.148 0.558 0.576 0.649 0.022
ER‐neg./PR‐neg. vs. the other subgroups 0.075 0.044 0.877 0.253 0.072
Recurrencec vs. primary 0.806 0.356 0.341 0.631 0.012 a

aUpregulated, bDownregulated, cAt diagnosis. Significances in bold calculated by *Spearman‐Rho and **Mann–Whitney U‐test.