Table A2.
Formal Test for Equality of Pre-Expansion Trendsa.
| Expansion State | Child Insured | Both Insured |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 0.004 (.039) | −0.003 (.244) |
| Colorado | 0.003 (.084) | NA |
| District of Columbia | 0.004 (.283) | 0.006 (.155) |
| Hawaii | 0.006 (.064) | 0.005 (.205) |
| Idaho | 0.010 (.051) | −0.004 (.500) |
| Illinois | −0.002 (.299) | NA |
| Indiana | No pre-trend | |
| Iowa | 0.004 (.043) | −0.002 (.477) |
| Kansas | −0.000 (.992) | −0.004 (.027) |
| Louisiana | 0.016 (.581) | −0.046 (.198) |
| Maryland | −0.024 (.538) | −0.016 (.745) |
| Massachusetts | −0.007 (.045) | NA |
| Mississippi | No pre-trend | |
| Montana | 0.002 (.574) | −0.004 (.288) |
| New York | No pre-trend | |
| Ohio | No pre-trend | |
| Oregon | 0.0001 (.945) | −0.006 (.011) |
| Pennsylvania | −0.004 (.071) | −0.005 (.029) |
| South Carolina | −0.001 (.854) | −0.001 (.709) |
| South Dakota | No pre-trend | |
| Texas | No pre-trend | |
| Washington | No pre-trend | |
| West Virginia | No pre-trend | |
| Wisconsin | −0.0003 (.874) | 0.001 (.671) |
| Wyoming | −0.020 (.016) | −0.031(.002) |
a
Estimates represent the interaction term between year trend and treatment state dummy; P values are in parenthesis.
CO, IL, IN, and MA are excluded due to their exclusion from all dyad analyses.
Sample includes children in families with income up to 300% federal poverty level.