Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;42(5):1532–1544. doi: 10.1111/pce.13514

Table 1.

Summary of experiments included in this study, the measurements conducted in each experiment that are reported here, and the relative degree of severity of the drought stress treatment as indicated by the maintenance of biomass or grain yield compared with the well‐watered (WW) control treatment

Drought stress compared with WW control (DS‐WW)/WW × 100
Experiment Number of genotypes Measurements reported Biomass Grain yield
Aus—field
2010 220 Leaf rolling score, midseason shoot biomass, NDVI, CT, DTF, yield, and biomass at harvest −10% −20%
2011 248 Midseason shoot biomass, NDVI, CT, DTF, yield, and straw biomass at harvest −42% −50%
Early 2012 68 All genotypes: leaf rolling score, NDVI, CT, DTF, yield, and straw biomass at harvest
Selected genotypes: midseason biomass, leaf dimensions, stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, [ABA]leaf, volumetric soil moisture
−33% −30%
Mid 2012 144 −30% −53%
Late 2012 34 −29% −63%
2012WS 8 Leaf anatomy, stomatal density, yield, and biomass at harvest −52% −84%
2018DS 6 Leaf anatomy n/a n/a
Aus—greenhouse lysimeters 226 All genotypes: leaf rolling score
Selected genotypes: soil moisture dry‐down, leaf dimensions, stomatal conductance, leaf water potential, [ABA]leaf
−38% n/a
Tropical japonica—greenhouse pots 172 Leaf rolling score, leaf dimensions, specific leaf area, shoot biomass, soil dry‐down rate −45% n/a