Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Addict. 2018 Dec;27(8):608–611. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12827

TABLE 1.

Baseline characteristics of police officers who participated in 3-month follow-up following a police education program in Tijuana, Mexico (n = 759)

Variable Police officers with conceptual knowledge of cannabis possession n = 141; (%, [IQR]) Police officers with no conceptual knowledge of cannabis possession n = 618; (%, [IQR])  p-value Total police officers n = 759; (%, [IQR])
Gender
 Female 16 (11.3%) 96 (15.5%) 0.237 112 (14.8%)
 Male 125 (88.7%) 522 (84.5%) 647 (85.2%)
Median age 35.0 (29.0–41.0) 38.0 (34.0–44.0) <0.001 38.0 (33.0–43.0)
Marital status
 Married/Common law 101 (75.4%) 477 (80.4%) 0.194 578 (79.5%)
 Other 33 (24.6%) 116 (19.6%) 149 (20.5%)
Educational level
 High school or less 100 (70.9%) 495 (80.1%) 0.023 595 (78.4%)
 More than high school 41 (29.1%) 123 (19.9%) 164 (21.6%)
Median years in law enforcement 9.5 (3.1–14.6) 12.0 (9.0–18.6) <0.001 11.2 (8.0–18.3)
Current rank
 Officer 115 (81.6%) 512 (82.8%) 0.713 627 (82.6%)
 Other 26 (18.4%) 106 (17.2%) 132 (17.4%)
Current assignment
 Patrol (e.g., car/truck, foot) 120 (85.1%) 545 (88.2%) 0.322 665 (87.6%)
 Administrative (e.g., guard booth) 21 (14.9%) 73 (11.8%) 94 (12.4%)
Commissioned to district/section of Tijuana
 Zona Centro 19 (13.5%) 85 (13.8%) 1.000 104 (13.7%)
 Other 122 (86.5%) 533 (86.2%) 655 (86.3%)

PEP, police education program; IQR, interquartile range.