Table 2.
Pearson correlation (R) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stimulation | Upper lip | Lower lip | Cheek | Sound only | LED |
Whisker pad | 0.272*** | 0.253*** | 0.166* | 0.257* | 0.358*** |
Upper lip | 0.192** | 0.189** | 0.130 | 0.129 | |
Lower lip | 0.387*** | 0.513*** | 0.339*** | ||
Cheek | 0.485*** | 0.362*** | |||
Sound only | 0.523*** |
For each Purkinje cell, we made pair‐wise comparisons of the Z scores of the response amplitudes to different stimuli. For each pair of stimuli, the Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was calculated for the complete population of Purkinje cells subjected to that pair of stimuli. The P values of these correlations underwent Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. These data are graphically represented in Fig. 5 A. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.