Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 11;597(9):2483–2514. doi: 10.1113/JP277413

Table 2.

Correlations between response probabilities

Pearson correlation (R)
Stimulation Upper lip Lower lip Cheek Sound only LED
Whisker pad 0.272*** 0.253*** 0.166* 0.257* 0.358***
Upper lip 0.192** 0.189** 0.130 0.129
Lower lip 0.387*** 0.513*** 0.339***
Cheek 0.485*** 0.362***
Sound only 0.523***

For each Purkinje cell, we made pair‐wise comparisons of the Z scores of the response amplitudes to different stimuli. For each pair of stimuli, the Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was calculated for the complete population of Purkinje cells subjected to that pair of stimuli. The P values of these correlations underwent Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons. These data are graphically represented in Fig. 5 A. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.