Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;597(9):2403–2420. doi: 10.1113/JP277333

Table 2.

Sinusoidal analysis

Power (W/m3) f max (Hz) E v (kN/m2) E e (kN/m2) at max. power E e (kN/m2) at 650 Hz fE e (Hz)
Control 100 ± 11 151 ± 2.9 146 ± 15 326 ± 22.5 389 ± 26.5 248 ± 4.82
R249Q/R249Q line 19 33 ± 4.7* 121 ± 3.8* 63 ± 8.2* 323 ± 19.8 318 ± 21.4 250 ± 17.3
R249Q/R249Q line 12 24 ± 2.3* 111 ± 3.2* 44 ± 4.8* 346 ± 35.2 418 ± 43.3# 229 ± 5.30*
R249Q/+ 55 ± 6.1* 155 ± 2.9+ 78 ± 8.9* 301 ± 22.7 297 ± 23.2* 271 ± 8.21+

Numbers are the average of values derived from the sinusoidal experimental run that generated maximum power for each fibre (± SEM). The only exceptions are the dip frequency (fE e), which represents the frequency where the elastic modulus (E e) is lowest, and the E e at 650 Hz. −E v is viscous modulus. f max is the oscillation frequency where maximum power (Power) was generated. *Significant difference from the control; +significant difference between homozygous line 19 and heterozygous lines; #significant difference between R249Q/R249Q line 12 and R249Q/R249Q line 19 (one‐way ANOVA; P < 0.05). n = 12 for control, R249Q/R249Q line 19, and R249Q/+ fibres. n = 8 for R249Q/R249Q line 12. The data set of individual fibre values used to calculate these values can be found in the third tab of Supplemental File S1 in Supporting Information.