Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;66(5):1207–1221. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2870542

TABLE II. Summary of the Metrics Extracted for Every Exercise. Analysis is Grouped by Type of Controller Used (Unilateral Versus Bilateral). P-values From Running a Mann-Whitney Test Between the Groups are Indicated.

Description Unit Formula Non haptics Haptics P-value
Mean SD Mean SD
Maximum force measured at the tip Inline graphic Inline graphic 6.87 4.00 4.28 1.96 0.0019
Mean force measured at the tip Inline graphic Inline graphic 0.81 0.42 0.48 0.30 0.0023
Overall execution time Inline graphic Inline graphic 577 227 615 330 0.89
Total time that the laser was active Inline graphic 175 57 201 87 0.34
Total time that the auditory cue was given Inline graphic 85.75 71.07 55.45 91.75 0.0011
Travelled path by grasper master Inline graphic Inline graphic 5333 4970 4590 3353 0.61
Number of pieces of tissue being peeled (fewer is better) 1.19 0.48 1.08 0.28 0.58
Number of times …
…the user had an accident with the instruments 1.04 1.02 0.36 0.64 0.0077
…the laser pedal was pressed 23.2 8.6 25.4 13.0 0.80
…the user fully closed the grasper 18.6 13.7 24.8 24.1 0.55
…the grasper was unclutched (off) 4.22 4.37 3.88 4.87 0.60
…the endoscope was unclutched (off) 16.6 10.0 17.8 12.6 0.73
…the auditory cue was given 63 50 42 42 0.016
Time that the grasper was unclutched Inline graphic 67.0 97.2 73.3 115.8 0.66
Time that the endoscope was unclutched Inline graphic 19.3 8.98 22.1 16.0 0.96
Jerkiness of grasper master Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 40.6 31.6 32.7 19.4 0.29
Jerkiness of endoscope master Inline graphic Inline graphic 3.82 3.71 3.22 2.31 0.86
Jerkiness of grasper slave Inline graphic Inline graphic 34.4 34.9 21.2 18.4 0.036
Jerkiness of endoscope slave Inline graphic Inline graphic 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 Inline graphic0.99

a Inline graphic