Table 3.
Correlations for the SASPD, IPO, LPFS, and BPS
| SASPD TOT | IPO TOT | LPFS TOT | LPFS ID | LPFS SD | LPFS E | LPFS IN | BPS TOT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SASPD TOT | .55 | .63 | .59 | .60 | .49 | .59 | .62 | |
| IPO TOT | .82 | .77 | .76 | .70 | .74 | .66 | ||
| LPFS TOT | .91 | .93 | .90 | .92 | .68 | |||
| LPFS ID | .81 | .72 | .73 | .70 | ||||
| LPFS SD | .78 | .78 | .63 | |||||
| LPFS E | .84 | .51 | ||||||
| LPFS IN | .58 | |||||||
| BPS TOT | ||||||||
| PiCD DT | .53 | .41 | .51 | .41 | .46 | .44 | .55 | .49 |
| PiCD DL | .31 | .48 | .43 | .34 | .38 | .43 | .42 | .41 |
| PiCD AK | −.09 | −.06 | −.05 | −.04 | −.13 | .00 | −.02 | −.06 |
| PiCD NA | .58 | .62 | .63 | .72 | .57 | .45 | .50 | .77 |
| PiCD DN | .49 | .59 | .55 | .51 | .60 | .41 | .46 | .64 |
| FFM E | −.37 | −.05 | −.22 | −.21 | −.21 | −.14 | −.21 | −.21 |
| FFM A | −.38 | −.38 | −.41 | −.27 | −.41 | −.44 | −.41 | −.23 |
| FFM C | −.46 | −.39 | −.43 | −.40 | −.54 | −.29 | −.33 | −.40 |
| FFM N | .63 | .59 | .60 | .70 | .58 | .37 | .46 | .73 |
| FFM O | −.15 | .07 | −.10 | −.03 | −.08 | −.17 | −.11 | .00 |
Note. N = 269. Correlations above .17 significant at p < .01. Bold = Large effect size (Cohen, 1992). Italics = moderate effect size. SASPD = Standardized Assessment of Severity of Personality Disorder, BPS TOT = Borderline Specifier Scale, PiCD = Personality Inventory for ICD-11, DT = Detachment, DL = Dissocial, AK = Anankastic, NA = Negative Affectivity, DN = Disinhibition, FFM E = five-factor model composite extraversion, FFM A = five-factor model composite agreeableness, FFMC = five-factor model composite conscientiousness, FFM N = five-factor model composite neuroticism, FFM O = five-factor model composite openness.