Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 29;2:150. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0389-3

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Crucial role of Eomes for iNKT cell terminal differentiation. a Percentage of CD1d-tet+TCRβ+iNKT cells in WT and Eomes cKO thymus, spleen, and liver (n = 6–8, mean ± SEM). b CD24, NK1.1, and CD44 staining on gated iNKT cells from (a). c Percentage of stage 0 to 3 iNKT cells from WT and Eomes cKO mice (n = 6–8, mean ± SEM). d Expression of Vα14TCR in WT and Eomes cKO mice was assessed by flow cytometry as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Similar data were obtained from at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***< p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney e Quantitative PCR analysis of Eomes mRNA in thymic iNKT cells (TCRβ+CD1d-tetramer+) from WT mice: stage 0 (CD24+CD44NK1.1CD69+), stage 1 (CD24CD44NK1.1), stage 2 (CD24CD44+NK1.1), stage 3 (CD24CD44+NK1.1+). (n = 6, mean ± SEM) **p < 0.01, two-tailed Student’s t-test