Table 4.
Counselling manner (n = 270).
|
CommunicationHow did MS assess … n (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | Very good | Good | Fair | Poor | Score | |
| Clarity of counselling | 139 (51.5) | 85 (31.5) | 39 (14.4) | 7 (2.6) | 0 (0) | 1.6 |
| Confidentiality of counselling | 102 (37.8) | 90 (33.3) | 61 (22.6) | 15 (5.6) | 2 (0.7) | 2.0 |
| Non-verbal communication | 143 (53.0) | 88 (32.6) | 28 (10.4) | 9 (3.3) | 2 (0.7) | 1.7 |
| Attention and interest | 106 (39.3) | 84 (31.1) | 52 (19.3) | 22 (8.1) | 6 (2.2) | 2.0 |
| Type of counselling* | 150 (55.6) | – | – | – | 120 (44.4) | |
*
Spontaneity of counselling was assessed as 1-excellent, requested counselling as 5-poor. The value score was assigned according to school grades (1- excellent … 5- poor).