Methods | Single‐centre RCT Inclusion grade 3 or 4 cysto‐urethrocele (BW halfway system) No exclusion No power Randomisation and concealment, blinding not stated 6/12 follow‐up |
|
Participants | No CONSORT N = 108 Inclusion: women with grade 3 or 4 cysto‐urethrocele (BW halfway system) There were no significant differences between the groups regarding preoperative storage symptoms, urodynamics, and degree of prolapse |
|
Interventions | A (54): anterior colporrhaphy alone B (54): anterior colporrhaphy with tension‐free polypropylene (Gynemesh PS) overlay |
|
Outcomes | Assessed at 6 months' postop Reports the following review outcomes:
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | At 6 months, group A 43/54, group B 46/54; greater than 15% loss to follow‐up at 6 months |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Did not report any of the primary outcomes of this review; only has 6 months' follow‐up |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No statement about funding |