Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 9;2016(2):CD012079. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012079
Methods Single‐centre RCT
Inclusion grade 3 or 4 cysto‐urethrocele (BW halfway system)
No exclusion
No power
Randomisation and concealment, blinding not stated
6/12 follow‐up
Participants No CONSORT
N = 108
Inclusion: women with grade 3 or 4 cysto‐urethrocele (BW halfway system)
There were no significant differences between the groups regarding preoperative storage symptoms, urodynamics, and degree of prolapse
Interventions A (54): anterior colporrhaphy alone
B (54): anterior colporrhaphy with tension‐free polypropylene (Gynemesh PS) overlay
Outcomes Assessed at 6 months' postop
Reports the following review outcomes:
  • Recurrent prolapse (anterior compartment) at 6 months

  • Objective failure of anterior compartment at 6 months (grade 2 or worse anterior wall prolapse)

  • Mesh erosion

Notes    
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes High risk At 6 months, group A 43/54, group B 46/54; greater than 15% loss to follow‐up at 6 months
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Did not report any of the primary outcomes of this review; only has 6 months' follow‐up
Other bias Unclear risk No statement about funding