Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;80(2):186–195. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2019.80.186

Table 2.

Individual, neighborhood, family and peer factors by alcohol trajectory group

graphic file with name jsad.2019.80.186tbl2.jpg

Eighth-grade factor Overall (n = 584) Abstainers (n = 122) Experimenters (n = 80) Adult increasing (n = 103) Young adult increasing (n = 127) Adolescent limited (n = 64) Adolescent increasing (n = 88) p
Male, n (%) 327 (56.0) 78 (63.9) 45 (56.2) 51 (49.5) 59 (46.5) 45 (70.3) 49 (55.7) .011
Black, n (%) 508 (87.0) 108 (88.5) 72 (90.0) 95 (92.2) 111 (87.4) 52 (81.2) 70 (79.6) .088
Lunch,a n (%) 234 (52.2) 51 (54.3) 36 (60.0) 42 (51.8) 45 (46.9) 25 (47.2) 35 (54.7) .637
Intervention, n (%) 386 (66.1) 77 (63.1) 56 (70.0) 71 (68.9) 81 (63.8) 41 (64.1) 60 (68.2) .850
Neighborhood disadvantage, M (SD) -1.22 (0.81) -1.39 (0.78) -1.27 (0.85) -1.11 (0.81) -1.24 (0.83) -1.07 (0.80) -1.16 (0.78) .076
Neighborhood disorder, M (SD) 17.4 (6.4) 17.1 (6.3) 17.8 (6.9) 16.3 (6.0) 16.4 (6.0) 19.8 (6.7) 18.1 (6.8) .006
Alcohol availability, M (SD) 3.01 (1.51) 2.64 (1.48) 2.90 (1.62) 2.73 (1.46) 2.98 (1.48) 3.50 (1.51) 3.61 (1.32) <.001
Perceived parental drinking approval, n (%) 65 (11.1) 13 (10.7) 7 (8.8) 4 (3.9) 16 (12.6) 7 (10.9) 18 (20.4) .016
Parental supervision, M (SD) 3.84 (1.29) 4.11 (1.24) 4.02 (1.19) 3.97 (1.07) 3.77 (1.33) 3.52 (1.39) 3.49 (1.44) .002
Perceived peer drinking, n (%) 1.93 (1.11) 1.45 (0.80) 2.01 (1.18) 1.62 (0.95) 1.77 (0.94) 2.83 (1.29) 2.43 (1.12) <.001
Perceived peer drinking approval, M (SD) 219 (37.5) 37 (30.3) 32 (40.0) 24 (23.3) 40 (31.5) 36 (56.2) 50 (56.8) <.001

Notes: Multiple imputation results with 20 imputed data sets were similar with p = .7953.

a

These are the observed data with n = 136 missing lunch status.