Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan-Mar;15(1):62–69. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-15-1-62

Table 1.

Summary of gene transfer technologies. AAV: adeno-associated virus; ASO: antisense oligonucleotides; siRNAs: small interfering RNAs; CRISPR/Cas9: Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; NHEJ: nonhomologous end-joining

APPROACH TECHNOLOGY STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES POTENTIAL THERAPEUTIC TARGETS
Overexpression AAV Safe for use in humans
Nonreplicating
Low risk of insertional mutagenesis
Noncytotoxic, modest immune response
Efficient transduction of dividing and nondividing cells
Strong and sustained transgene expression for months to years
Limited packaging capacity ~4.9 kb
Artificial expression cassettes do not preserve endogenous regulation
High frequency of neutralizing antibodies to AAV capsids in humans
T-cell responses to capsid managed with immunosuppression
Pursued
LPL
LDLR
Possible
LCAT
APOE
APOC2
APOA1
LIPA
LIPC
LDLRAP1
GPIHBP1
Knockdown ASOs Efficient knockdown by RNAse H recruitment or translation blocking
Splicing modulation by targeting pre-mRNA
Chemically modified for improved liver uptake
Efficient long-term silencing with weekly or biweekly administration
Subcutaneous injection
Chemical modifications needed to increase nuclease resistance and half-life
Possibility of sequence-related off-targets
Potential class effects depending on modifications
Mild skin reactions
Pursued
APOB
APOC3
ANGPTL3
LPA
Possible
PCSK9
siRNA Efficient knockdown by RNAi machinery
Long-term silencing can be achieved
Chemically modified for direct liver uptake
Can also be effective at lower doses via lipid nanoparticle delivery
Possibility of sequence-related off-targets
Potential class effects depending on modifications
Some formulations require intravenous injection
Pursued
PCSK9
Possible
APOB
APOC3
ANGPTL3
LPA
Genome editing CRISPR/Cas9 Ease of design and customization
High NHEJ-mediated editing efficiency
Multiplex genome editing capacity
Correct gene dosage
Preservation of regulatory elements
One-time treatment
Permanent correction to patient's own DNA
Potential off-target activity that requires careful testing
Potential unintended consequences at the DSB site (i.e., large insertions/deletions)
Low efficiency of HDR-mediated gene correction (restricted to dividing cells)
Potential immune response against Cas9-expressing cells
Possible
APOB
APOC3
ANGPTL3
PCSK9
LPA