Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 10;12:141–145. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S197511

Table 3.

Attitudes toward research ethics committees and informed consent

Number Item Agree, n (%) Disagree, n (%) Neutral, n (%)
1 Researchers must take measures to protect patient data from being exposed by accident 192
(95.5)
1
(0.5)
8
(4)
2 Patients should be informed about compensation policy in case of injury due to protocol 174
(86.1)
6
(3.5)
21
(10.4)
3 Patients should be informed of the complete information of alternative options 176
(87.6)
11
(5.4)
14
(7)
4 Informed consent from patients is necessary in case of the use of their biological samples in research 160
(81.2)
11
(5.6)
26
(13.2)
5 There is a need for a research ethics committee in each research conducting institution 148
(75.5)
12
(6.1)
36
(18.4)
6 All types of research proposals involving human subjects must be submitted for review to a research ethics committee 149
(74.5)
18
(9)
33
(16.5)
7 The research ethics committee members should have training in research ethics 160
(80.4)
11
(5.5)
28
(14.1)
8 Vulnerable groups such as children, prisoners, and mentally ill patients could provide informed consent 66
(33.3)
93
(47)
39
(19.7)
9 If no surrogate (caregiver) is available to give informed consent for vulnerable groups they could still be included 54
(27)
98
(49)
48
(24)
10 Ethical review of research by a research ethics committee would delay research and make it harder for the researcher 62
(31)
92
(46)
46
(23)
11 Research ethics should be taught as a mandatory postgraduate module 151
(75.1)
15
(7.5)
35
(17.4)