Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 25;41(3):413–418. doi: 10.1002/clc.22890

Table 2.

Comparison of echocardiographic characteristics between patients with and without RV involvement

Patients With RV Involvement on ECG, n = 38 Patients Without RV Involvement on ECG, n = 43 P Value
LVEDD, mm 45.7 ± 4.0 46.9 ± 4.2 0.19
LVESD, mm 32.9 ± 4.1 30.9 ± 4.7 0.04a
LVEF, % 54 ± 9.2 56 ± 10.1 0.09
RV diameter, mm 34.2 ± 5.1 35.1 ± 4.9 0.44
RV FAC, % 42 ± 11 38 ± 12 0.29
TAPSE, mm 12.7 ± 2.9 17.9 ± 3.3 <0.001a
RV S′, cm/s 9.4 ± 1.7 12.3 ± 2.3 <0.001a
LV GLS, –% 14.3 ± 1.9 16.6 ± 3.0 <0.001a
RV GLS, –% 13.8 ± 3.4 17.1 ± 4.3 <0.001a

Abbreviations: ECG, electrocardiography; FAC, fractional area change; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LV, left ventricular; LVEDD, left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end‐systolic diameter; RV, right ventricular; RV S′, right ventricular systolic velocity; SD, standard deviation; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.

Data are presented as mean ± SD.

a

Statistical significance at P < 0.05.