Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;41(12):1593–1599. doi: 10.1002/clc.23096

Table 2.

Association of ideal cardiovascular health metric (≥3 factors vs <3 factors) with subclinical atherosclerosis (continuous)

Outcome Adjustment N ≥3 vs < 3 ideal CVH factors: Beta (95% CI) P‐value
CAC Unadjusted 774 −84 (−143, −25) 0.01
Model 1 774 −102 (−159, −44) <0.001
Model 2 774 −108 (−165, −50) <0.001
Model 3 774 −107 (−165, −50) <0.001
IMT Unadjusted 782 −0.05 (−0.08, −0.02) <0.001
Model 1 782 −0.04 (−0.07, −0.02) <0.001
Model 2 782 −0.04 (−0.06, −0.01) <0.001
Model 3 782 −0.04 (−0.06, −0.01) <0.001
fRHI Unadjusted 1404 0.10 (0.05,0.15) <0.001
Model 1 1404 0.09 (0.05,0.14) <0.001
Model 2 1404 0.07 (0.02,0.12) <0.001
Model 3 1404 0.07 (0.02,0.12) 0.01

Abbreviations: CAC, coronary artery calcium; CVH, cardiovascular health; fRHI, Framingham reactive hyperemia index; IMT, intima‐media thickness.

Model 1: age and sex, Mode 2: age, sex, and race, and Model 3: age, sex, race, low income, low education, and single living status.