Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 27;40(3):155–162. doi: 10.1002/clc.22641

Table 2.

Filled LLT prescriptions in the overall cohort and hierarchical subgroups

Recent ACS (n = 23 040, 2%) Other CHD (n = 419 010, 40%) Ischemic Stroke (n = 37 309, 4%) PAD (n = 123 960, 12%) Only DM (n = 452 613, 43%) Total Cohort (N = 1 055 932)
High‐intensity statin, % 1 27.0 16.5 9.4 6.4 7.4 11.4
Monotherapy 96.2 90.4 96.7 93.8 94.5 92.2
Plus ezetimibe 2.6 6.7 2.3 4.1 3.5 5.3
Plus other nonstatin LLT 1.2 3.0 1.0 2.1 2.0 2.5
Moderate‐intensity statin, % 1 30.1 30.9 28.1 24.8 27.3 28.5
Monotherapy 96.2 93.9 97.4 96.0 96.0 95.1
Plus ezetimibe 2.6 4.1 1.6 2.7 2.6 3.2
Plus other nonstatin LLT 1.2 2.0 1.0 1.4 1.4 1.6
Low‐intensity statin, % 1 4.5 4.7 5.9 5.2 5.2 5.0
Monotherapy 97.7 96.2 98.3 97.5 97.4 97.0
Plus ezetimibe 1.5 2.1 0.7 1.3 1.2 1.5
Plus other nonstatin LLT 0.9 1.7 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.4
Nonstatin LLT only, % 1 0.7 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.0
Ezetimibe 55.0 55.8 47.8 48.4 47.3 51.3
Other nonstatin LLT 45.0 44.2 52.2 51.6 52.7 48.7
Not currently treated by LLT, % 1 37.8 46.9 55.8 62.6 59.2 54.1
Previously on high‐intensity statin 13.7 7.3 4.5 2.8 3.6 4.9
Previously on medium‐intensity statin 22.2 17.4 16.4 11.5 14.2 15.1
Previously on low‐intensity statin 4.1 3.7 4.3 3.0 3.6 3.6
Previously on nonstatin LLT 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.3
No previous LLT 58.6 70.1 73.8 81.4 77.4 75.0

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CHD, coronary heart disease; DM, diabetes mellitus; LLT, lipid‐lowering therapy; PAD, peripheral arterial disease.

1

Numbers in this row are absolute percentages and add up to 100% vertically. All other numbers are relative percentages of the absolute percentages.