Skip to main content
. 2016 May 10;39(7):406–412. doi: 10.1002/clc.22545

Table 2.

AF Recurrence Counts and Results of Logistic Regression With Respect to LASI ≥/< 0.9 at Different Follow‐up Times

LASI <0.9, n = 69 LASI ≥0.9, n = 55 Proportion P Value Crude OR Crude 95% CI Crude P Value Adjusted OR Adjusted 95% CI Adjusted P Value
28 days 26 (38%) 45 (82%) 2 × 10−6 7.4 (3.3‐18.0) 2.9 × 10−6 7.7 (3.3‐20.0) 7.5 × 10−6
3 months 30 (43%) 47 (85%) 4 × 10−6 7.6 (3.3‐19.7) 7.2 × 10−6 7.5 (3.2‐19.7) 1.4 × 10−6
6 months 36 (52%) 47 (85%) 0.0002 5.4 (2.3‐13.8) 0.0002 5.2 (2.2‐13.5) 0.0003
12 months 46 (67%) 49 (89%) 0.007 4.1 (1.6‐11.9) 0.005 3.9 (1.5‐11.5) 0.008

Abbreviations: AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HTN, hypertension; LA, left atrial; LASI, left atrial sphericity index; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; OR, odds ratio; TEE, transesophageal echocardiography.

In the adjusted model, we adjusted for treatment (TEE or conventional), AF duration, and interactions between treatment and AF duration. The LA volume, LVEF, LV volume, age, sex, smoking, HTN, dyslipidemia, β‐blockers, IHD, height, weight, and BMI were not included, as they did not significantly improve the fit.