Table 5. Factors associated with WTP for cervical cancer screening service, CMHS, UoG, Ethiopia, 2018.
Parameter for MWTP | Category | Coefficient | Standard error | t-value | P-value | 95% Confidence Interval | Marginal effect = Probability (dy/dx) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age(ref. age<30 years) | D | ||||||
Age≥30years | -25 | 10.6 | -2.24 | 0.019 * | -45.9, -4.2 | -.025 | |
Marital status(ref. married) | S | ||||||
Single | -10.7 | 10.9 | -0.98 | 0.325 | -32.1, 10.7 | ||
Divorced | 2.4 | 32 | 0.07 | 0.940 | -60.5, 65.3 | ||
Widowed | 16 | 50.8 | 0.31 | 0.753 | -84, 116 | ||
Religion (ref. Orthodox) | S | ||||||
Muslim | 0.12 | 15.2 | 0.01 | 0.994 | -29.8, 30.1 | ||
Protestant | -16.9 | 25.4 | -0.66 | 0.507 | -66.8, 33.1 | ||
Others | -42.4 | 60.9 | -0.70 | 0.487 | -162.3, 77.5 | ||
Ethnicity | S | ||||||
Tigre | 7.7 | 18.5 | 0.42 | 0.678 | -28.7, 44.1 | ||
Oromo | 2 | 33.5 | 0.06 | 0.954 | -64, 67.8 | ||
Others | -8 | 27.5 | -0.29 | 0.770 | -62.1, 46.1 | ||
Background profession (ref. Public Health Officer) | S | ||||||
Pharmacy | 9.9 | 19.7 | 0.50 | 0.618 | -28.9, 48.6 | ||
Nurse | -0.9 | 15.4 | -0.06 | 0.953 | -31.2, 29.4 | ||
Midwifery | 11.1 | 17.5 | 0.63 | 0.527 | -23.3, 45.5 | ||
Medical Laboratory | 3.1 | 27.2 | 0.11 | 0.909 | -50.4, 56.5 | ||
Others | -2.5 | 25.8 | -0.10 | 0.922 | -53.2, 48.2 | ||
Educational status(ref. Diploma) | S | ||||||
First Degree | 33 | 17.9 | 1.85 | 0.066 | -2.2, 68.3 | ||
Second Degree | 48.6 | 24.5 | 1.99 | 0.048* | 0.45, 96.8 | .01 | |
Knowledge (ref. poor Knowledge) |
S | ||||||
Moderate Knowledge | 19.2 | 23.8 | 0.81 | 0.421 | -27.6, 66 | ||
Excellent Knowledge | 19.2 | 22.1 | 0.87 | 0.386 | -24.3, 62.6 | ||
Health Status(ref. Poor | S | ||||||
Medium | -20 | 20.4 | -0.98 | 0.327 | -60.1, 20.1 | ||
Good | -24.3 | 19.2 | -1.26 | 0.207 | -62.1, 13.6 | ||
Perceived seriousness cervical cancer (ref. less serious) | S | ||||||
Serious | 121.2 | 17.5 | 6.94 | 0.000 *** | 86.9, 155.6 | .056 | |
Highly serious | 139.2 | 18.7 | 7.44 | 0.000 *** | 102.4, 176 | ||
Perception of service quality (ref. Very Low) |
S | ||||||
Low | 115 | 52.4 | 2.19 | 0.029* | 11.8, 218.3 | ||
Medium | 179.3 | 52 | 3.44 | 0.001*** | 76.8, 281.7 | .059 | |
High | 198 | 50.4 | 3.93 | 0.000*** | 98.8, 297 | ||
Very High | 228 | 51.8 | 4.40 | 0.000*** | 126, 330 | ||
Source of more Information (ref. Internet) | S | ||||||
Mass media | -10.4 | 26 | -0.40 | 0.690 | -61.6, 40.8 | ||
School | -5.4 | 25.3 | -0.21 | 0.832 | -55.1, 44.4 | ||
Training | 6.6 | 30.9 | 0.22 | 0.830 | -54.1, 67.4 | ||
Others | 37.3 | 54.5 | 0.68 | 0.495 | -70, 144.6 | ||
Monthly Income(Birr) | N | ||||||
0.04 | 0.004 | 11.3 | 0.000*** | 0.03, 0.05 | .00005 |
Note:
***significant with p-value ≤ 0.001;
*significant with p-value ≤ 0.05; S = String variable; N = Numeric value and D = Dummy Variable