Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;2018(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2

Beretta 1976.

Study characteristics
Methods Phase III parallel‐group RCT.
Open label study.
Participants Untreated metastatic melanoma.
Randomised participants: 450.
Interventions Four‐arm study:
  • Dacarbazine 100 mg/m² IV daily days 1 to 5, vincristine 1.4 mg/m² IV days 1 and 15, Carmustine 100 mg/m² IV day 1 (N = 207);

  • Dacarbazine 100 mg/m² IV daily days 1 to 5, vincristine 1.4 mg/m² IV days 1 and 15, hydroxyurea 10 mg/kg IV days 7, 10, 13, 17, 21, 24 (N = 122);

  • Dacarbazine 100 mg/m² IV daily days 1 to 5, actinomycin D 0.05 mg/m² IV days 1 and 15, Carmustine 100 mg/m² IV day 1 (N = 98);

  • Dacarbazine 100 mg/m² IV daily days 1‐5, actinomycin D 0.05 mg/m² IV days 1 and 15, Hydroxyurea 10 mg/kg IV days 7, 10, 13, 17, 21, 24 (N = 23).

Outcomes Overall survival.
Tumour response.
Toxicity.
Notes Cross‐over: not reported.
Quality of life: not reported.
Participants with brain metastasis: included.
Median follow‐up: not available.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Randomly allocated".
Comment: There was insufficient information to permit judgment.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk There was insufficient information to permit judgment.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk As an open label study, no blinding of participants or personnel was possible. However, we believe that in this setting (metastatic melanoma), with the treatments tested and outcomes assessed, the knowledge of which intervention was received or administered (rather than the intervention itself), could not affect the outcomes under investigation. Therefore, we judged the risk of performance bias as low.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk There was insufficient information to permit judgment.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Unclear risk There was insufficient information to permit judgment.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk One arm (D) was closed early and participants' data were not analysed.
Other bias Unclear risk There was insufficient information to permit judgment.