Eisen 2010.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Phase II/III parallel‐group RCT. Double‐blind study. Multicentre trial. |
|
Participants | Previously treated metastatic melanoma. Participants randomised: 306. |
|
Interventions | Two‐arm trial:
|
|
Outcomes | Progression‐free survival. Overall survival. Tumour response. Toxicity. |
|
Notes | Cross‐over: not reported. Quality of life: not investigated. Participants with brain metastasis: excluded. Median follow‐up: not available. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients were randomized using an interactive voice response system". Comment: Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Double‐blind". Comment: This method makes low the risk of performance bias |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Double‐blind". Comment: This method makes low the risk of detection bias |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing outcome data were balanced across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No differences between protocol and published report. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other sources of bias. |