Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;2018(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2

Hodi 2010a.

Study characteristics
Methods Phase III parallel‐group RCT.
Double‐blind study
Participants HLA‐A*0201–positive metastatic melanoma which had progressed during systemic treatment .
Participants randomised: 676.
Interventions Three‐arm trial:
  • Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg + gp100 peptide vaccine every 3 weeks for 4 treatments (N = 403);

  • Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 treatments (N = 137);

  • gp100 peptide vaccine for four treatments (N = 136).

Outcomes Overall survival.
Progression‐free survival.
Tumour response.
Toxicity.
Notes Cross‐over: not allowed.
Quality of life: Ipilimumab did not have a detrimental effect on QoL during the treatment induction phase (Revicki 2012).
Participants with brain metastasis: participants with active, untreated metastases in the central nervous were excluded.
Median follow‐up: 21 months.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned".
Comment: Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: “Double‐blind”.
Comment: This method ensured low risk of performance bias.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: “Double‐blind”.
Comment: This method ensured low risk of detection bias.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data were balanced across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No differences between protocol and published report.
Other bias Low risk The study appeared to be free of other sources of bias.