Hodi 2010a.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Phase III parallel‐group RCT. Double‐blind study |
|
Participants | HLA‐A*0201–positive metastatic melanoma which had progressed during systemic treatment . Participants randomised: 676. |
|
Interventions | Three‐arm trial:
|
|
Outcomes | Overall survival. Progression‐free survival. Tumour response. Toxicity. |
|
Notes | Cross‐over: not allowed. Quality of life: Ipilimumab did not have a detrimental effect on QoL during the treatment induction phase (Revicki 2012). Participants with brain metastasis: participants with active, untreated metastases in the central nervous were excluded. Median follow‐up: 21 months. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned". Comment: Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Risk was likely low because this was a multicentre trial with centralised randomisation. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: “Double‐blind”. Comment: This method ensured low risk of performance bias. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: “Double‐blind”. Comment: This method ensured low risk of detection bias. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing outcome data were balanced across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No differences between protocol and published report. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other sources of bias. |