Postow 2015.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Phase I dose‐escalation parallel‐group RCT. Double‐blinded study. |
|
Participants | Untreated metastatic melanoma. Participants randomised: 142. |
|
Interventions | Two‐arm trial:
|
|
Outcomes | Progression‐free survival. Tumour response. Toxicity. |
|
Notes | Cross‐over: cross‐over was allowed at disease progression. Quality of life: not reported. Participants with brain metastasis: excluded. Median follow‐up: > 11 months. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned". Comment: There was insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgment. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | There was insufficient information to permit judgment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Double‐blind trial". Comment: The method ensured low risk of performance bias. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "Double‐blind trial". Comment: The method ensured low risk of detection bias. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Missing outcome data were balanced across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No differences between protocol and published report. |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appeared to be free of other sources of bias. |