Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 6;2018(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2

Postow 2015.

Study characteristics
Methods Phase I dose‐escalation parallel‐group RCT.
Double‐blinded study.
Participants Untreated metastatic melanoma.
Participants randomised: 142.
Interventions Two‐arm trial:
  • Nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks, and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks for cycle 3 and beyond (N = 95);

  • Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 4 doses, followed by placebo every 2 weeks for cycle 3 and beyond (N = 47).

Outcomes Progression‐free survival.
Tumour response.
Toxicity.
Notes Cross‐over: cross‐over was allowed at disease progression.
Quality of life: not reported.
Participants with brain metastasis: excluded.
Median follow‐up: > 11 months.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Patients were randomly assigned".
Comment: There was insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgment.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk There was insufficient information to permit judgment.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Double‐blind trial".
Comment: The method ensured low risk of performance bias.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk Quote: "Double‐blind trial".
Comment: The method ensured low risk of detection bias.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Missing outcome data were balanced across intervention groups, with similar reasons for missing data across groups.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No differences between protocol and published report.
Other bias Low risk The study appeared to be free of other sources of bias.