Chen 2016.
Methods | Country: Taiwan Setting: community (schools) Type: RCT |
|
Participants | 75 parent and child dyads in 6 elementary schools (grades 3 to 6); school was the unit of assignment | |
Interventions |
Intervention: Parent‐child dyads received an interactive programme comprising 3 weekly group sessions and 1 individual telephone counselling session 4 weeks after group sessions. Control: Written materials related to tobacco information were received by mail 4 times during the same time period instead of the intervention sessions. |
|
Outcomes | Child exposure: urine cotinine as well as parent and child reports of children's exposure to parental smoking Target knowledge change: Aims of intervention were to instil knowledge regarding the mechanism of the harmful effect of ETS, to correct people's perceptions of the smoking patterns that lead to ETS exposure at home, to introduce strategies for reducing ETS, and to assist parent‐child dyads in formulating strategies for maintaining a smoke‐free home. |
|
Type of intervention | Community‐based | |
Notes | Conflict of interest: none declared Source of funding: National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC97‐2314‐B‐038‐043‐MY3) |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 21% dropout rate |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Single‐blind; objective measure (cotinine) |
Other bias | High risk | Selection bias: differences in participation rates between intervention and control groups. Non‐simultaneous collection of self‐reported data and urine cotinine levels during post‐test 2 may have caused inconsistency in the data. |