Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;2018(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4

Kallio 2006.

Methods Country: Finland
 Setting: community, well baby clinics
 RCT
Participants 1062 families presenting at a well baby clinic in Turku with a child 5 months old
Interventions Component of larger prospective intervention trial aimed at decreasing exposure of children to known environmental cardiovascular risk factors
 Intervention: Parents received booklet about the adverse effects of smoking at age 5 years. Counselling from paediatrician and dietician consisted of discussion with parents about major cardiovascular risk factors including smoking. Appointment with paediatrician and dietician at 1‐ to 3‐monthly intervals until age 2 years, then 6 monthly
 Control: normal health education given to all Finnish families at well baby clinics and throughout the school system. Appointment with paediatrician and dietician at 4‐ to 6‐monthly intervals until age 2 years, then 6‐monthly until age 7, then yearly
Outcomes Follow‐up when child 8 years of age:
 • Parent report of smoking status and habits, reported child exposure to ETS in past 3 days
 • Parent serum cotinine
Type of intervention Well‐child (child health check)
Notes Retention: 625/1062 (59%)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "Random numbers"; further details not provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk High but similar dropout rates in both groups overall (serum cotinine measured in 306/540 intervention and 319/522 control). However, attrition of smokers not quantified and attrition analysis not reported. Trial authors write: "It is possible that smokers have discontinued participation in STRIP more frequently than non‐smokers".
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biochemical validation used