Nicholson 2015.
Methods | Country: USA Setting: hospital Type: RCT |
|
Participants | 119 parents or guardians of children receiving treatment for cancer who lived with at least 1 adult smoker and were exposed to SHS in the home or car setting | |
Interventions |
Intervention: multi‐component behavioural programme over 3 months; counselling consisted of 3 individual, face‐to‐face, biweekly 1‐hour sessions followed by 3 25‐minute telephone sessions for a total of 6 individual contacts with the counsellor. Parents also received letters from their child's physician at the start and at the end of the counselling phase to acknowledge their participation and progress. Control: standard care and equivalent follow‐up to intervention arm |
|
Outcomes | Child exposure (and target behaviour change): full smoking ban ‐ defined as a household with smokers that prohibited all smoking in the home and in the car | |
Type of intervention | Child with health problems (ill‐child health care) | |
Notes | Conflict of interest: none declared Source of funding: Grants CA085406 and CA21765 from the National Cancer Institute and the American Lebanese Associated Charities |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Stratified, blocked randomisation scheme with strata including child's age and race, as well as smoking status of the participating parent |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not specified |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 91% follow‐up rate |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not specified |
Other bias | High risk | Reporting bias: smoking bans self‐reported, not validated biochemically |