Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 31;2018(1):CD001746. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001746.pub4

Woodward 1987.

Methods Country: Australia
 Setting: maternity hospital
 CT: allocation by month of delivery
Participants 184 parents of newborn babies whose mothers smoked during pregnancy
Interventions Intervention: Mothers in the maternity hospital were given an information kit about the effects of ETS on children and ways to quit smoking, along with a letter from the director of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit urging parents to avoid exposing children to ETS. The kit was given to women by a research worker, who explained the material and answered questions. Women were telephoned at 1 month and were asked about their progress and use of the kit, and were given further information if required.
 Control and follow‐up only: did not receive the above intervention
Outcomes At 3 months:
 • Infant urine cotinine levels
 • Maternal quitting, maternal cotinine
Type of intervention Well‐child (peripartum)
Notes Retention: 157/184 (85%)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) High risk Non‐randomised; group assignment by month of admission
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk See above.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Similar and high rates of follow‐up in both groups (54/61 intervention, 57/62 control)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biological validation used