Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 28;2018(2):CD011809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011809.pub2

Comparison 2. Seminal plasma vs standard ART, per‐pregnancy analyses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Miscarriage 4 277 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.92 [0.54, 1.57]
1.1 Vaginal only 1 96 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.26, 2.73]
1.2 Cervical only 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Vaginal and cervical 2 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.32, 1.51]
1.4 Intrauterine only 1 78 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.48 [0.57, 3.86]
2 Multiple pregnancy 5 370 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.69, 1.24]
2.1 Vaginal only 3 168 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.26 [0.79, 1.99]
2.2 Cervical only 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 Vaginal and cervical 2 202 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.52, 1.11]
2.4 Intrauterine only 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Ectopic pregnancy 5 277 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.15, 8.98]
3.1 Vaginal only 3 168 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.06, 26.80]
3.2 Cervical only 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.3 Vaginal and cervical 1 31 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.4 Intrauterine only 1 78 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.11 [0.07, 17.09]