Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;2017(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3

Baskin 2014.

Methods Study design: Randomised Controlled Trial. Object of randomisation: patients
Participants Turkey. Doctors who collected ABG samples from patients in the emergency care department. Number studied: 550 patients. Intervention group n = 275. Control group n = 275.
Interventions Use of safety‐engineered blood gas syringes which once in the artery filled automatically as a result of arterial pulse pressure. The control group used conventional heparinised syringes.
Outcomes (1) Number of needlestick injuries (2) Number of events of blood splashes (3) Number of attempts (4)The degree of difficulty of ABG extraction procedure according to physicians.
Notes Includes information about cost analysis.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The method of randomization carried out was not mentioned.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes were used.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information available.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No missing outcome data. Data available includes all physicians who performed arterial blood gas extraction procedures (n = 27).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Pre‐specified outcomes were reported accordingly.
Similar recruitment of groups Low risk The study included patients who visited the ED during the period of May 1, 2012 to June 30, 2012.
Adjustment for baseline differences Low risk There was no significant difference between groups in terms of age, weight, sex, height, wrist circumference and BMI.
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other types of bias.