Nicodemus 1991.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: prospective, randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial Intention‐to‐treat: not stated Sample size calculation: not stated Setting: single centre. USA Follow up: 24 hours |
|
Participants | N = 60 (60% male) Age: 2 to 13 years |
|
Interventions | Group 1: (n = 30) intraoral infraorbital nerve block with 1 to 1.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus adrenaline Group 2: (n = 30) saline placebo in the infraorbital area |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Jadad score: 4 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not stated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | "The anaesthetist who performed the block and the subsequent evaluation, the nurses and the parents who evaluated the patient's comfort were all kept unaware of the identity of the solution used for block" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | See above |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No losses |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The report of the study was free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting |
Other bias | High risk | Size: sample size less than 50 per treatment arm |