Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 13;2016(4):CD011131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011131.pub2

Nicodemus 1991.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: prospective, randomised, double‐blind, controlled trial
Intention‐to‐treat: not stated
Sample size calculation: not stated
Setting: single centre. USA
Follow up: 24 hours
Participants N = 60 (60% male)
Age: 2 to 13 years
Interventions Group 1: (n = 30) intraoral infraorbital nerve block with 1 to 1.5 ml bupivacaine 0.5% plus adrenaline
Group 2: (n = 30) saline placebo in the infraorbital area
Outcomes
  • Pain reported by the children through visual analogue scale (0 to 5)

  • Pain evaluated by nurses and parents through score (0 to 4)

  • Length of analgesia

  • Supplemental analgesic requirements

Notes Jadad score: 4
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk "The anaesthetist who performed the block and the subsequent evaluation, the nurses and the parents who evaluated the patient's comfort were all kept unaware of the identity of the solution used for block"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes Low risk See above
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk No losses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk The report of the study was free of suggestion of selective outcome reporting
Other bias High risk Size: sample size less than 50 per treatment arm